Source catalogue

The Magistrate of Kraków requests the search for and imprisonment of a Frenchman named Szewele, also known as Rytter, in Lwów. He is accused of defrauding creditors, fleeing with over seven hundred red zlotys, and abandoning his pregnant wife. Information regarding two previous wives is presented as a rumor.

Kraków thanks the magistrate of Lwów for the letter of August 8, conveying news about contagious diseases in Podolia, Ukraine, Kamieniec Podolski, and Żółkiew, as well as the precautionary measures taken. It requests further news and declares reimbursement for the costs of transporting the letters.

Kraków has learned that Lviv sent two barber-surgeons to the vicinity of Tarnopol to verify reports of contagious diseases. They request a report on their findings in order to take precautionary measures in advance. The sender expresses hope that the rumor will not be confirmed.

Responding to an inquiry from Lviv, Lublin provides details on fees: one zloty for the voivode and three groszy for the deputy voivode per barrel of wine. No similar charges are indicated for other goods. It mentions levies on food brought from the countryside and contributions from merchants and guilds during the twice-yearly price-fixing process. It requests that the response remain confidential.

The Lublin magistrate complains that the butchers' guild refuses to pay the poll tax, citing their residence outside municipal jurisdiction, and has issued summonses against the city before the kaptur courts. They ask the Lwów magistrate for an authentic document confirming whether guilds there pay the burdens of the Commonwealth and the city even when their members reside under other jurisdictions. In a postscript, they inquire about the organization of the Lwów court, the role of clerical judges, and the venue for court proceedings.

The authorities of Lublin reiterate their request to the Lviv magistrate to send a decree of the Radom Tribunal regarding the exemption from the exchange of red zlotys. In return for the assistance, they declare their readiness to reciprocate in similar matters.

The Lublin magistrate refers to reports of a royal commission examining the case between the authorities of Lviv and the Jews trading in the city. They wish to emulate Lviv's actions and request a certified copy of the decree, specifically the point concerning the removal of Jews, to serve as a precedent. They declare their willingness to cover the chancery fees.

The Lublin Magistrate expresses gratitude for the interest shown in an unusual and unfortunate incident and for the letters of intercession. They request that the case, which is to be heard by the Tribunal, be recommended to the Archbishop of Lviv, and that the enclosed letter be delivered to him. The document does not describe the incident itself nor does it name the parties involved in the dispute.

The councilors respond to the envoys' letter dated in Warsaw on January 4. They request the finalization of the matter with Mr. Paczek, send documents and 70 zlotys via the city clerk's servant, Marcin. They urge the envoys to remain and prevent damage to the city's interests.

Lviv land judges Piotr of Branew and Jan of Wysocice confirm the verdict of King Casimir Jagiellon prohibiting the burgher Paweł Klyus from unlawfully collecting customs duties in Krosno to the detriment of Mikołaj Brzymała of Bierwac.

Poznań expresses sympathy for the injury suffered by the president and the entire magistrate of Lviv, according to a letter dated January 5, 1738. It declares a joint defense of municipal rights and the sending of information to the Chancellor and the royal court, requests further details, and wishes the president a speedy recovery. The original does not mention the perpetrators or the exact course of events.

The Lviv land judge and sub-judge certify the testimony of Elżbieta of Gołogóry, who recorded a debt of 200 grzywnas to the Lviv Archbishop Grzegorz of Sanok on the village of Wicyń. This entry increased the previous sum burdening this estate to a total of 800 grzywnas.

Judge Gunter of Sieniawa and sub-judge Jan of Wisznia certify that Jan of Zimna Woda acknowledged a debt to Jerzy, son of the late Fryderyk, and pledged half of the village of Zimna Woda, including the mill and the inn, for a period of six years. The document establishes the terms of use for the property, the deadline and conditions for the repayment of the sum, and the obligation to defend the creditor's rights to the pledged assets.

The Lviv land judge and sub-judge certify that the Lviv burgher Mikołaj, son of the late Karnasz, has acquitted the Trembowla wojski Jan Jura of Malechów and Ostrów of the full repayment of debts. All previous entries and claims burdening the estates of Malechów and Ostrów have been legally cancelled.

The mayor and councilors of Jarosław request the council of Lwów to announce to merchants that the upcoming Jarosław fair will take place at the usual time. They invoke the will and authority of the Marshal and Grand Hetman of the Crown and their benefactress, encouraging merchants to arrive with goods without fear of hostile actions. This is a guarantee and invitation from the senders, not a confirmation of the fair's actual proceedings.

The authorities of Jarosław respond to a letter from Lviv regarding merchant attendance at the fair. They report that on that day, they instructed the bailiff to announce during the market an invitation for safe arrival, without fear of extraordinary extortions. They refer to the promised protection of the Marshal and the Grand Crown Hetman and offer New Year's greetings.

Jarosław responds to Lviv's request by sending the executioner. They demand his prompt return after the execution, with a certificate and proper transport. A Lviv burgher remains in Jarosław as a guarantee of his return.

Aloy could not personally assist the envoy in Warsaw as he was staying in Dresden. However, he assures that he recommended the magistrate to an unnamed dignitary, who accepted the Lenten gift. The delivery of the gift is not described in detail.

Antici received the magistrate's letters via their envoy, who arrived in Rome on November 15. He assures them of his continued assistance in defending public rights and announces a joint consultation with the envoy and Stefanoni regarding measures to ensure a successful outcome.

After reading the archbishop's official declaration, Antici recommends a settlement. He argues that the intended relocation of the painting of the Blessed Virgin Mary from the chapel is to leave patronage rights, foundations, and religious services intact, and that further litigation could expose the magistrate to defeat, disgrace, and costs. He proposes mediation by a learned clergyman friendly to both parties.

Antici assures his commitment to the addressees' affairs and reports obtaining an injunction from the Sacred Congregation of the Council. He requests a power of attorney issued in his name, with the right to appoint Francesco Stefanoni or another substitute, and funds for expenses. He declares that he is not seeking his own fee.

The author received two letters, documents, and a remittance from Warsaw smaller than announced: 54 ducats, corresponding to 27 Hungarian ducats, instead of 30. He refers the matter to Stefanoni, to whom further correspondence should be addressed. He explains that the chapter may support the archbishop and mentions an information letter submitted to the Congregation.

Marcin Anczewski reproaches the Lviv councilors for their lack of gratitude and failure to pay the sums due to him for the efforts and expenses incurred for the good of the city. He informs them that he has filed a lawsuit against the magistrate and the commoners in the royal court and urges them to settle the debt amicably before the hearing date.

Marcin Anczewski reports from Warsaw on his efforts to secure an audience regarding a dispute with the Armenians, complaining about the exorbitant cost of living and the impatience of his traveling companions who wish to return home. He also asks the recipient to urgently raise funds to repay a loan in order to save the delegation's credibility.

Armand confidentially reports on the agreement between the Queen and her son Jakub after 10–12 days of negotiations. The Queen was to settle for a life interest in the late husband's estates; movables, jewels, and cash were to be divided equally between the brothers. He lists the mediators and the dates of the dietines on July 27 and the convocation on August 29, which point to the year 1696.

The author advises the recipient on matters of travel, money, carriage, servants, and gifts. He recommends winning over the French court by showing respect to the monarch and avoiding criticism of the candidate from the previous election. He emphasizes the assistance of the Marquise de Béthune.

The author recalls advice regarding the journey, informs about the Chancellor's daughter's wedding, and recommends a young nobleman endorsed by the Marchioness de Béthune. He reiterates an unconfirmed report regarding the execution of Vaudémont.

The author clarifies the matter of undelivered letters to the Marquise de Béthune and an order for mirrors. He reports on the French envoy's departure to the King in Biržai, rumors regarding the court's return and peace with Sweden, and concerns about the internal situation.

De Baluze expresses his joy at the improvement of the recipient's relationship with the Queen. He conveys the version of the statements made by the executed participants of the plot against William of Orange, taken from a Dutch newspaper, and defends James II and France against accusations of complicity. He mentions the movements of the French fleets, the state of the King's health, and the postponed departure of the court to Ruthenia.

J. G. de Baluze informs the Voivode of Volhynia about the progress of peace talks in Delft, false reports regarding preliminary articles, and French naval armaments in Brest and Rochefort.

The author expected the recipient's arrival, but received his letter addressed to Paris. He conveys news favorable to France and determines the next steps regarding the bill of exchange sent by the Pilski stolnik.

The Archbishop of Lviv, Andrzej Boryszewski, approves the foundation and endowment of the altar of the Nativity of the Blessed Virgin Mary and St. Stanislaus in the Lviv Cathedral with an annual rent of 20 marks, secured by Anna of Buczacz on the Litwinów estate and its appurtenances. The document defines the right of patronage of the Buczacki family and imposes on the altarist the obligation to celebrate three masses per week.

Bartsch awaits the Chancellor's response to the municipal project and discusses documents needed to confirm the city's rights regarding scales and jurisdiction. He reminds of the need for a prior decree from the Treasurer and the preparation of a settlement of the Jews' debt. He also writes about the planned assistance of the Bishop at the Sejm and renews his request for funds to cover his stay.

Bartsch thanks for the declaration of remuneration and explains the necessity of the magistrate's response to the chancellor's letter. He informs about the decree concerning municipal sums, the cases of the Hołosko parish priest and Maciej, and the lawsuit with the Dominicans. He requests authentic copies, the patron's fee, and funds for his stay in Warsaw. He advises caution in printing parliamentary bills, announces interventions regarding street stalls and the warehouse, and requests a broad power of attorney.

Bartsch reports on a project submitted to the Chancellor, the planned activities of the Commission of Good Order, and the need for a memorial to the King. He describes discussions regarding privileges, Catholics, and dissidents, as well as the proposed condition of bearing municipal burdens for the admission of foreign merchants. He announces further consultations on law and jurisdiction, urges the second deputy to arrive, and requests funds for further work.

Bartsch complains about the decline in respect for municipal authorities, describes an audience with the commander, and the submission of a memorandum regarding the incident with captains Kudelski and Witowski. The commander cites previous interventions and public duties that prevent Bartsch's release. The author renews his requests, contacts the primate, and awaits the Starosta of Lwów.

Bartsch has received a letter from the city authorities and announces he will submit the attachment to the Vice-Chancellor and request support in the dispute with the Dominicans. He forwards the Chancellor's letter regarding the Hołosko case, reports on the Ruthenian Bishop's intended actions, and the request for a date for the commission settling city accounts. He thanks them for the news about the fire at the Dominicans' and points out the need for additional deputies and the possibility of an amicable settlement with the parish priest.

Bartsch informs the authorities of Lwów about his arrival in Warsaw, consultations regarding the city, and a scheduled audience with the Grand Treasurer of the Crown. He conveys news about the expected arrival of the Primate, the commander, and the princes, and explains that the wait may delay his departure to Białystok. He promises further information.

The deputies await the outcome of the city's projects submitted to the Chancellor along with the postulates of other cities. They report on Russian and Prussian interventions, upcoming regional diets (sejmiki), and the continuation of the Sejm. They request documents concerning sums secured on city property for the settlement proceedings expected in February. In a postscript, they reiterate their request for the promised letters.

Bartsch thanks the city authorities for his previous election to their ranks, offers New Year's greetings, and conveys a rumor regarding a commission for all cities. He reports on the beginning of the Senatus Consilium, but there is no news yet on the start of the court sessions.

The authors have undertaken efforts in Warsaw regarding the recovery of a sum owed to the city. Bartsch reports on obtaining a decree based on provided copies, a request for a statement of the city's revenues, and a memorial to the Chancellor covering the dispute with the garrison, officer quarters, the case of a certain burgher, and claims against the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. He requests additional documents, the assistance of the accompanying Cyruli, and the coverage of expenses.

Copy of the Scottish proclamation of indulgence: permission for moderate Presbyterians to hold services only in private houses, separate relief for Quakers, suspension of laws against Catholics, and conditional amnesty. The document maintains the ban on open-air services, introduces a new oath of absolute obedience, and orders publication and sealing. This is not the English Declaration of April 4, 1687.

King Alexander Jagiellon exempts the subjects of the village of Honiatycze, belonging to the Lviv Chapter, for 15 years from all labor services and stationing for the Lviv castle due to the destruction caused by Turks and Tatars. He orders the Lviv Starosta, Stanisław of Chodecz, and his successors to strictly observe this relief.

The Marchioness asks her son-in-law to take in a young nobleman, the son of her impoverished friend. She praises his upbringing, knowledge of mathematics and fortifications; the young man is interested in languages and foreign countries. Mr. de Balus is to act as an intermediary in the matter.

Jan of Dawidów, sub-judge of Lwów and patron of the parish church in Dawidów, presents to the Archbishop of Lwów, Bernard Wilczek, the cleric Jerzy of Lwów for the parish vacant after the death of Gotard. He requests the granting of canonical investiture and the entrustment of spiritual and temporal administration of the parish.

King Sigismund I the Old confirms the privilege of King Casimir IV Jagiellon from 1472, which established two annual fairs in Lwów for the feasts of the Holy Trinity and St. Agnes. The document regulates detailed trade rights, the staple right, customs duties, grazing of merchant cattle, and judicial jurisdiction over merchants.

Rafał Bojm informs Field Marshal Magnus Stenbock of his arrival in Jarosław and the obstacles encountered during his journey from Lviv. He inquires about the location for paying the agreed sum and requests the issuance of a salvaguardia to protect the city from further military burdens.

The document is an arbitration award regulating long-standing disputes between the Lviv Cathedral Chapter and the Lviv city magistrate, concerning, among other things, Polish and German language preachers, the administration of the cathedral school, deposits and testamentary bequests, and rights to the Olchowy Mill and municipal waterworks. Under penalty of two thousand Hungarian florins, it orders the parties to observe the agreed order in perpetuity.

Borowski responds to Syndic Frank regarding outstanding debts from the Sakrochowska tenement house. He questions the settlement and the city's delay, proposes a settlement with 5% interest, and threatens legal action in case of refusal.

Royal commissioners Stanisław of Chodcz and Mikołaj Lanckoroński issue to Jan Woleczek a transumpt of King Władysław III's 1440 privilege regarding the location of the village of Izdebnik under Magdeburg law and the granting of the reeveship to Włodko of Swemicz. The document confirms the reeve's endowment of two hides of land, meadows, a mill, and an inn, as well as the obligation of mounted military service with a crossbow.