Source catalogue

[Polish; translation pending] Katarzyna Godlewska zwraca się do brata, podstolego, w sprawie pieniędzy i opieki. Prosi o szybkie zawiadomienie; nieczytelne fragmenty dotyczą obaw i dalszych planów.

Gruszewicz explains that urgent necessity forced him to spend gold ducats left with him. He promises to return suitable coins and reminds the recipient of a promised dog.

The writer thanks Głogowski for his assistance, forwards a letter from her husband and assures him of her gratitude. A passage referring to Lublin remains partly unread.

A letter survives with a request addressed to a high-ranking recipient. Words concerning a matter and satisfaction can be discerned, but show-through and difficult handwriting prevent a reliable identification of its subject, course or outcome.

The sender addresses the recipient as Monseigneur and writes that they will comply with his instruction and show the queen a letter. The sender mentions a person or matter whose details cannot be read with confidence and asks for support for it. The letter ends with a humble courtesy formula; a separate final page bears the address of an unidentified dignitary. The date, place, and sender's identity are uncertain.

The sender addresses the recipient as a benefactor. In the surviving, difficult-to-read text, references to a matter, a letter, and a request for action or reply can be recognized; details and people are uncertain. The date written on the letter is 28 February 1692. The outer address leaf preserves a partly illegible form of address.

The sender addresses a Most Illustrious Lord and Benefactor. The surviving text is difficult to read, and its specific subject cannot be established. The date notation gives Sambor, 5 June 1637. The address leaf on pp. 3 and 5 contains an uncertain name or title and the designation “to the Samborski.” The inventory card gives a different unit start date.

The sender addresses the recipient as a brother and benefactor. The surviving text contains expressions of regard and further remarks that are difficult to read; the matter at issue cannot be reconstructed reliably. The date notation gives Lublin and 27 May 1691. The external address on p. 4 directs the letter to Lwów, but the recipient’s surname is illegible.

The sender conveys his respect and wishes the recipient a good and happy New Year. The short text is partly difficult to read. A note on the folded sheet mentions the Queen and an instruction to pass on a message, but most of its wording remains uncertain. The signature may read “Dumons.” The letter has its own date notation: Warsaw, 4 January 1703.

The surviving letter is addressed to a Most Illustrious Benefactor. The handwriting is very difficult to read in places. Visible fragments suggest requests and matters concerning correspondence and actions taken for the recipient, but the details cannot be reconstructed with confidence. The external address leaf preserves a formal form of address, while the surname and titles remain uncertain. The inventory card records that the unit was begun on 8 October 1697; this was not treated as the letter date. The note on the letter does not permit a reliable date reading.

The writer addresses the recipient as “my gracious Lord and Brother”, mentions a letter from another person, and raises a matter connected with Lublin. The text says that someone “demands” something, but the surrounding passage is too illegible to identify the subject or the party making the demand. The dateline reads 9 Junii 1685 at Kamionka; the recipient’s name on the folded address is uncertain.

The sender says she was pleased that the recipient “took” the widow Małachowa, who was said to retain great affection for him. She also mentions rumors, her own intention to visit or travel, and the recipient’s affairs, but the rest is partly illegible. The signature identifies Anna as a humble servant. The closing date notation contains “Maii 1773”, but the day and place are uncertain.

The sender acknowledges receipt of a letter concerning an “interessu do Seymiku” (the reading of the word requires caution). The remaining text refers to the course of the matter and efforts to obtain information, but details and names are illegible. The date reads “w Lwowie d. 28 Martii 1698” — Lviv, 28 March 1698.

The sender addresses a group as “Panowie” and refers to a matter presented to them. Legible fragments mention the addressees’ favor, an opinion, and the sender’s obligation; the remainder is too uncertain to identify the matter. The date line reads “w Warszawie d. 24 Aug 1684”. The signature and cover address are uncertain.

A substantial letter survives, addressed to the Crown Marshal, probably the Grand Crown Marshal, with the salutation “Most Illustrious Lord and Brother.” The archival card describes it as a letter from Adam Jabłonowski of Lachiew to the marshal with a request (the rest of that description is uncertain); the letter itself is too difficult to read to specify the request. The signature appears to read Adam Jabłonowski. The dateline reads “W Jabłonowie 16 Decembr 1696.”

The letter opens with the Latin salutation “Spectabilis Domine” and refers to public matters and correspondence, but the main line of argument remains uncertain. The closing date has not been read with sufficient confidence. Page 3 is an address/reverse leaf, not further letter text.

A one-page letter with a Latin form of address and Polish text. It refers to public matters and correspondence, but its specific substance cannot be reconstructed securely. The closing date is read as 19 September 1673. Page 3 carries an address and seal, not further text.

The writer addresses the Chancellor and discusses a matter in which a senator is mentioned. The letter refers to a document presented to the recipient and to further steps; details are difficult to read. The closing date is 23 May 1684. The recipient’s name on the outer leaf remains uncertain.

The surviving fragment addresses a Most Honorable Lord Benefactor and refers to a matter connected with a Sejm decision and people identified by official titles. Damage prevents a reliable reconstruction of the substance, sender, or date. The inventory card gives 30 August 1634, but this is not treated as a confirmed letter date.

A one-page letter survives with a salutation to an Illustrious Sir and Benefactor. The handwriting is difficult to read, and neither the subject nor the addressee’s surname can be established reliably. The archival cover attributes the letter to Zamoyski, but the document itself does not securely confirm this.

The writer addresses Forbes concerning an obligation or settlement. The text mentions the Crown Tribunal in Lublin and includes a request about further proceedings. The details and precise course of the matter cannot be confidently reconstructed.

The writer reports on a matter discussed with the recipient, refers to correspondence from Warsaw, and mentions an obligation or settlement. The later part names several people and refers to official or judicial actions, but their relationships and the details are difficult to reconstruct with confidence.