Source catalogue

Wessel confirms the acceptance of good Wrocław tynfs at two six-groschen coins each. He leaves the quality assessment to the sellers and buyers; he has forbidden the further issuance of plates used to distinguish them.

Wessel praises Lviv's vigilance against bad currency, criticizes border starosts, and orders supervision of circulation. A found stamp for small heads is to help detect the manufacturer.

Wessel allows the magistrate to publicly announce the marking of good six-groschen coins bearing his seal, if necessary. The condition is the undoubted quality of the coins attached to the notes.

Wessel responds to the New Year's wishes. He considers the previous universals a sufficient explanation of the announced reduction and announces the attachment of the decree of the Piotrków Tribunal.

Wielopolski explains that after a complaint against Ensign Koc was filed with the Hetman, he cannot resolve the matter himself. He is waiting for instructions from a higher authority without prejudging the validity of the allegations.

The archbishop asks for permission to take stones discovered and quarried at the expense of the parish priest in Kleparów. They are to serve to decorate the Church of St. Mary and the entire city.

The archbishop asks the magistrate for a fair hearing of Stanisław Rozesłanek's complaint against the executors of his brother's will and for protection against further claims.

Wyżycki supports the joint efforts of the magistrate for a patron and a feast day for the metropolis; he promises help with the king and an appeal to the head of the Church. The saint's name is not mentioned.

Wyżycki recommends Jan Jasiński and asks the magistrate for a presentation to replace the late Father Bogadzki in a benefice at the city's disposal.

Wiśniowiecki asks the magistrate for favor towards Antoni Cynalik in his case and promises lasting gratitude. He does not state the subject of the case.

Wiśniowiecki accuses the magistrate of opposing the agreements with the Metropolitan and the Basilians. He asks for the dispute to be settled, reminding them of their friendship and his own role in the agreement.

The author asks to suspend the trial with the Basilians until the Sejm. He mentions previous letters regarding St. Anthony, the recommendation of the Basilians, and the power of attorney for the deputies; he declares friendship for Lwów.

The author recalls the request from the letter written in Lwów and demands a favorable, quick resolution of Antoni Cynalik's case.

Legal advice for Lwów: closed Warsaw files, pospolite ruszenie (levy in mass), city guard, resistance to tax collectors, and appeals. The author recommends defending the city's jurisdiction.

The case of the condemnation related to Kupiński. The author advises filing a lawsuit to overturn the ruling and sending a syndic or another representative with the documents.

A fragmentarily read letter about a procedural document in the Kupiński case and the expected arrival of a representative in Warsaw.

The doctor's case and the possibility of hearing it out of turn. The Armenians are arguing over the open release of court files; the author cites the decree of John III from Żółkiew.

The author notifies about the proceedings for the non-appearance of the entire magistrate before the assessor's court and awaits instructions on this matter.

The author laments the outcome of Wilczkowa's case, but informs about a favorable change in the point of the verdict concerning the jurisdiction of Lwów.

Two court cases and waiting for the magistrate's instructions. The author writes about stopping their progress and the possibility of sending a deputy.

The Bishop responds to the magistrate's wishes and wishes all residents of Lwów prosperity in the new year and in the following years.

Wodzicki does not want to issue a rescript without knowing the case being heard by the assessor's courts. He forwards the documents to the Crown Chancellor.

Perykant Nowicki delivered the explanations of Doctor Franchi in the dispute with Wajzer, the royal jeweler. Wodzicki sends them to the court.

The heirs of Józef Szynoff sue Doctor Franchi for withholding money. The Bishop advises the magistrate to ensure payment, if necessary through the courts.

Wodzicki received a response regarding Wajzer's memorial. He asks to speed up the letter from Doctor Franchi, which he has not yet received.

The Bishop writes to the Starosta of Błonie regarding the execution concerning the townhouses and the protection of city jurisdiction. The middle legal clause requires further reading.

The Bishop appeals to the Voivode of Podolia to restrain his son. He advises the city to ask the hetman to use the garrison and to reach an agreement with the archbishop.

The Bishop sends interventions to the Grand Crown Hetman and the Starosta of Lwów. The magistrate receives copies and is to perform its duties in parallel.

Wodzicki thanks the magistrate for the Christmas wishes and reciprocates the wishes of prosperity for the residents of Lwów.

Wodzicki reciprocates the Easter wishes. He invokes the image of Christ breaking iron gates and wishes Lwów protection and prosperity.

A damaged letter thanking the magistrate for holiday wishes and reciprocating with wishes for prosperity.

The Bishop sends the response of the Starosta of Błonie, discusses unsatisfied creditor claims, and points to judicial proceedings as the way to recover the tenement house.

Wodzicki supports ceding the municipal wax-works land to Poniński. He cites a royal rescript and the possibility of finding another location.

Recommendation for the merchant Hampel from Warsaw to conduct municipal entertainment. The author points out the benefits of the influx of guests: house rentals, trade, and food sales.

Rzewuski, the Deputy Voivode of Lwów, demands a commission in response to the city's allegations. Wodzicki calls on the magistrate to appoint a person to oversee its establishment.

The author announces support for Lwów's case regarding the provision for the garrison. He is to meet the Field Hetman of the Crown in Wschowa; the details of the provision remain uncertain.

Following an intervention by the court in Dresden, the Bishop demands the execution of three debt payment judgments. He draws attention to the inherited estate and threatens consequences for delaying the execution.

Wodzicki responds to the city's Easter wishes. He wishes the residents an abundance of goods and the city God's protection.

Wodzicki recommends a swift resolution of the Bartch case and assistance to his son, who left Warsaw after his father's death. He mentions a lottery and a mandate against Surczyński.

Wodzicki declares his help in consolidating and expanding the rights of Lwów. He announces his departure for the Sejm following a recent illness.

The author demands an investigation into Dr. Awedyk's allegations against Rozalia Muratowiczowa and her sons: breaking into the house, taking money, pledges, equipment, and children. He demands their return and a ban on further intrusions.

Wodzicki sends the original memorial submitted to the King by Weyze. He asks the magistrate for a quick response, which he intends to forward to the court.

The administrator asks for the restoration of logging rights in municipal forests for the hospital court and the subjects of Malechów. He describes damages attributed to the neighboring village and a land dispute.

Gałecki intercedes for a party in a case before the municipal court and asks for the appeal to be admitted. The name of the protégé and the full justification require further reading.

Gałecki accepts the magistrate's request and assures them of his readiness to serve the city. An unclear fragment concerns an intended convenience for the city and expenses.

Gałecki sends New Year's wishes and intercedes for Tomasz [surname uncertain], asking for his admission to the city's official circle. He points to the efforts of the king and mutual friends.

After a recent mourning period, Gałecki invites the magistrate to a wedding with Rozalia Dzieduszycka, the castellan of Lubaczów. The ceremony is scheduled for February 14 at the Warsaw Castle, with the support of the king and queen.

Hankiewicz informs the magistrate that the chancellor does not want to postpone Lwów's cases any longer. He calls for the fastest possible dispatch of a proxy and announces the entry of the cases into the court register.

Gembicki asks the magistrate for kindness and official support for the Augustinians establishing a seat in Lwów.

Gembicki recommends a settlement with the starosta and adherence to market tax collection rules. He asks for clarification on the fodder tax, needed before issuing a decree concerning the obligations of Jews.